Best in 7 days
Pay in installments of $122.12 with
,
and
Shipping Estimate
USA
- USA
- CAN
- USA
- CAN
Ships within 48 hours · Estimated delivery Jul 21 - Jul 26
Promo Codes Available:
For Your Every Summer RSVP, with Code: SUMMER15
Description
Condizionatore Dual Split Ferroli Giada M 12+18 con 27-3 R-32 Wi-Fi integratoCaratteristiche tecniche Unit interne 1) Modello Codice catalogo unit interna : 1x 2CP001IF Potenza: 12000 btu h Capacit di raffreddamento : 3,515 kW Capacit di riscaldamento : 3,810 kW Livello potenza sonora : 53 dB(A) Livello pressione sonora : 22~40 dB(A) Diametro tubazioni liquido : 6,35 mm (1 4") Diametro tubazioni gas : 9,52 mm (3 8") Dimensioni unit interna (LxAxP) : 805x285x194 mm Peso unit interna : 7,6 Kg Wi Fi Integrato 2) Modello Codice
Shipping Notes
- Free Standard Shipping on $100+ Orders to the USA.
- Except Preorder products are shipped in 48 hours.
- Delivery to the USA:
- Standard Shipping : 3-10 business days
- If time is of the essence, please consider selecting expedited delivery for faster service.
Exchange/Return Notes
- We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
- Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
- To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
- Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy
Discover Niche Categories That Outsell
Top-Converting Item to Boost Your Average Order
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
Best in 7 days
4.6 ★★★★★
Based on 1540 reviews
Sort
Product Reviews
★★★★★ 5
Excellent socks
Size: X-Large, Color: White
Awesome love them
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on January 24, 2026
★★★★★ 5
very comfortable
Size: Large, Color: White
very cushioning and good value. These are my favorite socks.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on December 13, 2025
★★★★★ 5
Finally, socks that fit and are comfortable
Size: X-Large, Color: White
I wear size 12.5 Wide shoes and have been through numerous "large" socks that shrink after the first wash and then are just too small. Local stores sell very few options in XL. Decided to give these a try and I'm glad I did. I like the height (just over the ankle joint) versus low cut or no-show, which tend to allow junk into the gaps.
I like the material. It's thinner on top nd doesn't have compression areas. It's not overly thick, so if you are looking for cushion or extra support, look elsewhere. I have the same sock in a no-show in gray, but they are size L and are just a little too small, so I knew ahead what I was in for construction-wise. Those have been plenty durable, so it checks all the boxes.
I'll be ordering some XLs in black and will keep on the lookout for gray.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on June 3, 2021
★★★★★ 5
Nice fit & holds shape
Size: Large, Color: White
Wear well. Hold up in use. Maintain a shape after multiple uses.
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on November 20, 2025
★★★★★ 4
Great socks / a bit expensive
Size: Large, Color: Black
These may be the Goldilocks of the socks I've tried. They have nearly the same quality as the MUCH pricier Darn Tough Vertex Ultralight Cushion Cool Max socks (also reviewed). They have better quality, and a higher price, than a similar pair of PUMA socks (also reviewed).
Pros: Very well made, with no loose stitching, comfortable forefoot and heel cushioning, good ventilation via top mesh, good arch compression, minimal logos and mostly solid color.
Cons: Price is a bit on the high side, but better than the Darn Tough socks.
I could honestly have made a good case for any of these three (ASICS, PUMA, or Darn Tough), which explains their collective high ratings. I did the top 3 reviews first. When I get a chance, I'll go back and review the average and terrible :)
If money is no object, get the Darn Tough Vertex. If you're price sensitive, and willing to compromise a bit on quality, go with the PUMAs, which is what I did. Otherwise, these ASICS are near the same quality as the Darn Tough, but less expensive. Tough decisions :)
WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare
Reviewed in the United States on May 9, 2017
